Bill and Hillary Clinton: It’s Déjà vu all over again

By N. Beaujon
September 27, 2006

Let’s face facts. We all know that Clinton did nothing to bring down bin Laden and combat terrorism in his 8 long, agonizing (for us) years in office. The proof is always in the results. There was no action taken by Clinton and, as we now know, he never met with his director of CIA James Woolsey, who resigned in frustration or his Director of the FBI, Louis Freeh, who met with Clinton only once during his years in office.

We all know that Clinton ignored the first World Trade Center bombing, treating it like a law enforcement problem rather than an international crisis, And stood proudly behind the Torricelli Amendment to protect terrorists and their non-existent constitutional rights. The proof is the fact that its mastermind, the blind cleric Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman is sitting in a jail cell in Florence, Colorado passing marching orders through his radical left wing lawyer Lynne Stewart to his terrorist brigade Al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya, the group responsible for the Luxor tourist bombings and the assassination in New York of Rabbi Meir Kahane.

There is no doubt from all the data, or really the lack of data, that William Jefferson Clinton is almost entirely responsible for failing to act on the Al Qaeda menace when we had the chance(s). That would be before renowned terrorist Osama bin Laden blew up the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and 4 commercial jetliners along with 3,000 non-military targets (e.g. civilians) on that fateful day on Sept 11, 2001. It’s true Bush and his administration had 8 months to deal with the menace but even that was a little difficult given that Al Gore and his league of attorneys were so busy contesting the election that Bush didn’t even know if he was going to be president until a month before his inauguration. Logically, this left little time to put a cabinet in place let alone an infrastructure for fighting global terror. But no matter…

That didn’t stop Bill Clinton from doing what he always does best, and for what he will always be remembered, lying to the American people. Evidently, Clinton felt rather comfortable that whatever classified documents Sandy Berger stuffed down his pants during Trouser-gate would not only never be revealed but would protect him from ever being held accountable for his actions or lack thereof.

But let’s be clear on one thing: When Chris Wallace, during that fateful interview last week, asked Clinton the fairly innocuous question of, “Why didn't you do more to put bin Laden and Al Qaeda out of business when you were president?” Clinton responded as he always does by wagging his bony finger at the American public, purple with indignant rage, for another one of his insufferable lectures. Then, post haste, he drags out his shrew of a wife to cover up, yet again, for his lies by blaming the right wing media (Chris Wallace?), instead of her errant husband- something she is always more than willing to do.

It’s Déjà vu all over again. If the American public wants to be subjected to another 4- 8 years of dealing with these infants, liars and seditious traitors then, by all means, re-elect Hillary to the White House. If Americans are fed up with these embarrassing antics and seeing these drama queens distract from the most important issues we have on our global and domestic agenda, then make sure these Machiavellian criminals never see the inside of the White House again, except maybe when they are finally lying in state. That will be the last lie I’d want to see from the Clintons and the last lay Bill Clinton should ever have on the American public’s dime.


© N. Beaujon.com, September 27, 2006, All Rights Reserved.
Letters to the Editor